Actionstep vs ProLaw
Actionstep scores 7.6/10 vs 6.0/10. Best for: Firms that want to standardize their workflows with step-by-step matter templates so every case follows the same process regardless of who handles it.
Actionstep scores higher overall at 7.6/10 vs 6.0/10. Actionstep is the right pick if you want to systematize your firm's workflows so every matter follows the same playbook. The workflow builder is genuinely powerful. Skip it if you want a simple, pick-up-and-go tool — the setup investment is real.
Actionstep 
ProLaw Rank
#9 of 39
Rank
#37 of 39
Features
17/18
Features
16/18
Starting at
$69/mo
Starting at
Custom
User reviews
4/5 (200)
User reviews
3.5/5 (50)
What they cost
| Actionstep | ProLaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting at | $69 /mo | Contact for pricing |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Number of plans | 2 | Custom |
What the pricing really means
Actionstep publishes their pricing upfront, which is a good sign. ProLaw requires you to contact sales for a quote. When a company hides pricing, it usually means the cost is high enough that they want a salesperson to justify it before you see the number. Always ask for total year-one cost, not just the monthly subscription.
Where Actionstep wins
- Workflow automation is the core feature, with step-by-step matter templates that ensure nothing falls through the cracks
- Strong in conveyancing and property law workflows, which few competitors handle well
- Built-in trust accounting with compliance checks for multiple jurisdictions (US, UK, AU, NZ)
- API is robust enough to build custom integrations without hitting walls
Where ProLaw wins
- Backed by Thomson Reuters with direct integration to Westlaw and Practical Law
- Enterprise-grade financial management with LEDES billing, matter budgets, and profitability analysis
- Trust accounting with multi-bank, multi-currency support for large international firms
- Court rule calendaring included
Where Actionstep falls short
- No free trial — you commit based on a demo
- G2 rating of 4.0 is below average, with users citing a steeper learning curve than competitors
- Interface looks dated compared to Clio or PracticePanther
- Originally built for the Australian/NZ market, so some US-specific features feel like afterthoughts
Where ProLaw falls short
- G2 rating of 3.5 and Capterra 3.8 indicate significant user frustration with the interface
- No public pricing — likely $200+/user based on the enterprise positioning
- No client portal, no mobile app, no eSignature, no intake forms
- Implementation takes months, not days
Who is each product built for?
Actionstep
Target: 2-50 attorneys
Actionstep is the right pick if you want to systematize your firm's workflows so every matter follows the same playbook. The workflow builder is genuinely powerful. Skip it if you want a simple, pick-up-and-go tool — the setup investment is real.
ProLaw
Target: 25-1,000+ attorneys
ProLaw is a legacy enterprise product. Large firms already invested in Thomson Reuters' ecosystem may find value in the Westlaw integration, but modern alternatives like Filevine or Litify offer better user experiences at every scale.
Feature comparison
| Feature | Actionstep | ProLaw |
|---|---|---|
| Case Management | ||
| Case / matter management | ||
| Contact management | ||
| Conflict checks | ||
| Client intake forms | ||
| Client portal | ||
| Documents & Automation | ||
| Document management | ||
| Document automation | ||
| E-signatures | ||
| Email management | ||
| Billing & Accounting | ||
| Time tracking | ||
| Billing & invoicing | ||
| Trust / IOLTA accounting | ||
| Scheduling & Deadlines | ||
| Calendar management | ||
| Task management | ||
| Court rule deadlines | ||
| Platform | ||
| Reporting / analytics | ||
| Mobile app | ||
| API access | ||
Common questions
Actionstep scores 7.6/10 vs ProLaw's 6.0/10 in our ranking. Actionstep is the better pick for 2-50 attorneys. ProLaw is better if you need large firms (50+ attorneys) that want enterprise practice management from a trusted legal tech brand with deep integration into thomson reuters' legal research ecosystem.
Actionstep starts at $69/month. ProLaw uses custom pricing (contact sales). Watch for add-on costs — the base price often does not include all features. Pricing last verified 2026-04-11.
Actionstep: No free trial. ProLaw: No free trial. Always test with your actual workflow before committing to an annual plan.
Actionstep covers 17 of 18 features we track. ProLaw covers 16 of 18. Actionstep has broader feature coverage, but more features does not always mean better — pick the tool that covers what your business actually needs.
Yes, Actionstep has a mobile app. ProLaw does too.
Yes. The main effort is migrating your data (customer lists, job history, invoices). Plan for 1-2 weeks of overlap where you run both. Most legal practice management tools can import CSV data. Ask both vendors about migration support before you sign.
The bottom line
Pick Actionstep if...
Firms that want to standardize their workflows with step-by-step matter templates so every case follows the same process regardless of who handles it.
Pick ProLaw if...
Large firms (50+ attorneys) that want enterprise practice management from a trusted legal tech brand with deep integration into Thomson Reuters' legal research ecosystem.