Aspire vs Fergus
Fergus scores 7.0/10 vs 6.5/10. Best for: Trade businesses in Australia, New Zealand, and the UK who need job costing and financial tracking built into their workflow.
Fergus scores higher overall at 7.0/10 vs 6.5/10. Fergus is a strong choice for trade businesses in Australia, New Zealand, and the UK who want clear financial visibility on every job. Its job costing and Xero integration are standout features. US-based businesses should evaluate it carefully since the platform was built for Commonwealth markets first. If you need a customer portal or online booking, look at Jobber or Housecall Pro instead.
Aspire 
Fergus Rank
#27 of 35
Rank
#16 of 35
Features
13/17
Features
10/17
Starting at
Custom
Starting at
$48/mo
User reviews
— (170)
User reviews
4.3/5 (200)
What they cost
| Aspire | Fergus | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting at | Contact for pricing | $48 /mo |
| Free trial | No | 14 days |
| Number of plans | 3 | 3 |
What the pricing really means
Fergus publishes their pricing upfront, which is a good sign. Aspire requires you to contact sales for a quote. When a company hides pricing, it usually means the cost is high enough that they want a salesperson to justify it before you see the number. Always ask for total year-one cost, not just the monthly subscription.
Where Aspire wins
- Unlimited users included in licensing means no per-seat cost increases as you scale
- Real-time job costing gives precise margin visibility on every property and crew
- Estimating tools are deep with precise bidding capabilities for landscape maintenance contracts
- Now part of ServiceTitan family which adds long-term investment credibility
Where Fergus wins
- Financial tracking and job costing are genuinely strong for understanding business profitability
- 14-day free trial with no lock-in contracts and hassle-free cancellation
- Native Xero integration is excellent for businesses in AU/NZ/UK markets
- GPS tracking and photo documentation available on the Pro plan
Where Aspire falls short
- Extremely complex to deploy with users reporting it takes months to years to get full value
- Pricing is opaque and based on company revenue tiers which makes budgeting difficult
- Billing practices have been called predatory by some customers with overcharges taking months to resolve
- Mobile app and employee-facing tools are weaker than the back-office management features
Where Fergus falls short
- No customer portal or online booking limits client self-service
- Primarily built for AU/NZ/UK markets so US users may find some features localized differently
- No inventory management or maintenance agreement tracking
- Per-user pricing at $48-68 per month gets expensive for larger teams
Who is each product built for?
Aspire
Target: 20-500+ employees
Aspire is the dominant platform for landscape companies doing $2M or more in revenue who need enterprise-grade estimating, job costing, and crew management. It is not for small shops and the deployment is genuinely painful. If you are under $1M in revenue, the cost and complexity will crush you. If you are a large landscape operation ready to invest 6+ months in setup, it delivers real operational control.
Fergus
Target: 1-20 technicians
Fergus is a strong choice for trade businesses in Australia, New Zealand, and the UK who want clear financial visibility on every job. Its job costing and Xero integration are standout features. US-based businesses should evaluate it carefully since the platform was built for Commonwealth markets first. If you need a customer portal or online booking, look at Jobber or Housecall Pro instead.
Feature comparison
| Feature | Aspire | Fergus |
|---|---|---|
| Scheduling & Dispatching | ||
| Scheduling | ||
| Dispatching | ||
| GPS tracking | ||
| Online booking | ||
| Invoicing & Payments | ||
| Invoicing | ||
| Estimates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| QuickBooks integration | ||
| Operations | ||
| Mobile app | ||
| Customer portal | ||
| Inventory management | ||
| Maintenance agreements | ||
| Reporting | ||
| Growth | ||
| Marketing tools | ||
| Review management | ||
| AI features | ||
| API access | ||
Common questions
Fergus scores 7.0/10 vs Aspire's 6.5/10 in our ranking. Fergus is the better pick for 1-20 technicians. Aspire is better if you need mid-to-large landscape and commercial cleaning companies doing $2m+ in revenue who need real-time job costing and estimating.
Aspire uses custom pricing (contact sales). Fergus starts at $48/month. Watch for add-on costs — the base price often does not include all features. Pricing last verified 2026-03-01.
Aspire: No free trial. Fergus: Yes, 14-day free trial. Always test with your actual workflow before committing to an annual plan.
Aspire covers 13 of 17 features we track. Fergus covers 10 of 17. Aspire has broader feature coverage, but more features does not always mean better — pick the tool that covers what your business actually needs.
Yes, Aspire has a mobile app. Fergus does too.
Yes. The main effort is migrating your data (customer lists, job history, invoices). Plan for 1-2 weeks of overlap where you run both. Most field service management tools can import CSV data. Ask both vendors about migration support before you sign.
The bottom line
Pick Aspire if...
Mid-to-large landscape and commercial cleaning companies doing $2M+ in revenue who need real-time job costing and estimating
Pick Fergus if...
Trade businesses in Australia, New Zealand, and the UK who need job costing and financial tracking built into their workflow