Blueprint Health vs Valant

Blueprint Health scores 7.2/10 vs 5.8/10. Best for: Therapists who want a genuinely free EHR with the option to add AI note-writing at $0.

Blueprint Health logo

Blueprint Health

7.2
Better overall
vs
Valant logo

Valant

5.8

Blueprint Health scores higher overall at 7.2/10 vs 5.8/10. Buy Blueprint Health if you want the lowest-cost entry point in the category with a free EHR and optional AI add-ons. Skip if you need e-prescribing, a native mobile app, or want a platform with a longer track record.

Blueprint Health
Valant

Rank

#19 of 41

Rank

#41 of 41

Features

15/18

Features

17/18

Starting at

$0/mo

Starting at

$100/mo

User reviews

4.2/5 (45)

User reviews

3/5 (333)

What they cost

Blueprint Health Valant
Starting at Free /mo $100 /mo
Free trial Free tier available No
Number of plans 3 3
Blueprint Health pricing verified: 2026-04-01 Valant pricing verified: 2026-04-01

What the pricing really means

At first glance, Blueprint Health looks cheaper at $0/month vs $100/month. But sticker price is only part of the story. Look at what is included on the base plan, how many users you get, and whether you need add-ons to get the features you actually need. The $99/month plan that requires $200 in add-ons is actually more expensive than the $250/month plan that includes everything.

Where Blueprint Health wins

  • Core EHR is completely free with no client limits, no session limits, and no trial expiration, which is unmatched in the category
  • Pay-per-session AI pricing means you only pay $0.99-$1.49 when you actually use the AI scribe, not a flat monthly fee
  • Built-in telehealth included free on all plans, while competitors like TherapyNotes charge $15/mo extra
  • Over 70,000 therapists already use the platform, and the 600+ evidence-based intervention library adds real clinical value
  • 5 free Pro session credits on signup let you test the AI features before spending anything

Where Valant wins

  • 80+ built-in reportable outcome measures that auto-send, score, and graph over time, which is the deepest measurement-based care in the category
  • E-prescribing with EPCS and PDMP integration included, so psychiatrists can prescribe controlled substances without a separate tool
  • MYIO patient portal app for iOS and Android handles intake, payments, and appointment management from the client side
  • Telehealth supports group sessions with up to 30 participants, screen sharing, and whiteboard, which is more than most competitors

Where Blueprint Health falls short

  • Newer platform with limited review history on G2 and Capterra, so long-term reliability is harder to assess
  • No e-prescribing, so psychiatrists and prescribers will still need another system
  • No native mobile app yet, so documentation between sessions means opening a browser
  • Insurance claims and payment processing have per-transaction fees that could add up for high-volume practices

Where Valant falls short

  • G2 rating of 3.0/5 is among the lowest in the category, with complaints about navigation, glitches, and a steep learning curve
  • No published pricing means you must contact sales for a quote, and reported costs of $100-300/mo make it one of the pricier options
  • No free trial available, so you commit based on a demo rather than hands-on testing with your own workflows
  • Multiple reviewers report that telehealth sessions drop or lag, and the patient portal setup is described as an administrative headache

Who is each product built for?

Blueprint Health

Target: 1-20 clinicians

Buy Blueprint Health if you want the lowest-cost entry point in the category with a free EHR and optional AI add-ons. Skip if you need e-prescribing, a native mobile app, or want a platform with a longer track record.

TherapistsPsychologistsPsychiatrists

Valant

Target: 1-50 providers

Buy Valant if measurement-based care and psychiatry features like EPCS are non-negotiable for your practice. Skip if you want transparent pricing, a free trial, or reliable telehealth.

PsychiatristsPsychologistsTherapistsBehavioral Health Practices

Feature comparison

Feature Blueprint Health Valant
Compliance & Security
HIPAA compliant
Telehealth / video sessions
Secure messaging
Scheduling & Clients
Online scheduling
Client portal
Intake forms / assessments
Automated reminders
Clinical
Progress notes / documentation
Treatment plans
E-prescribing
Outcome measures / assessments
Billing & Payments
Insurance billing / claims
Payment processing
Superbill generation
Automated billing
Platform
Group practice support
Mobile app
Integrations / API

Common questions

Blueprint Health scores 7.2/10 vs Valant's 5.8/10 in our ranking. Blueprint Health is the better pick for 1-20 clinicians. Valant is better if you need behavioral health practices that need built-in measurement-based care with 80+ outcome scales and want to demonstrate treatment effectiveness to insurers.

Blueprint Health starts at $0/month. Valant starts at $100/month. Watch for add-on costs — the base price often does not include all features. Pricing last verified 2026-04-01.

Blueprint Health: Free tier available. Valant: No free trial. Always test with your actual workflow before committing to an annual plan.

Blueprint Health covers 15 of 18 features we track. Valant covers 17 of 18. Valant has broader feature coverage, but more features does not always mean better — pick the tool that covers what your business actually needs.

No, Blueprint Health does not have a mobile app. Valant does not have one either.

Yes. The main effort is migrating your data (customer lists, job history, invoices). Plan for 1-2 weeks of overlap where you run both. Most healthcare practice management tools can import CSV data. Ask both vendors about migration support before you sign.

The bottom line

Pick Blueprint Health if...

Therapists who want a genuinely free EHR with the option to add AI note-writing at $0.99 per session only when they need it.

Pick Valant if...

Behavioral health practices that need built-in measurement-based care with 80+ outcome scales and want to demonstrate treatment effectiveness to insurers.