CASEpeer vs Centerbase

CASEpeer scores 7.9/10 vs 7.5/10. Best for: PI firms that need medical records tracking, treatment timeline management, and settlement calculations built into their case management from day one.

CASEpeer logo

CASEpeer

7.9
Better overall
vs
Centerbase logo

Centerbase

7.5

CASEpeer scores higher overall at 7.9/10 vs 7.5/10. If you run a personal injury firm, CASEpeer does things that general practice management tools can't — medical tracking, settlement calculations, and demand letter generation. If you practice anything other than PI, look at Clio or MyCase instead.

CASEpeer
Centerbase

Rank

#5 of 39

Rank

#13 of 39

Features

18/18

Features

18/18

Starting at

$79/mo

Starting at

Custom

User reviews

4.6/5 (200)

User reviews

4/5 (80)

What they cost

CASEpeer Centerbase
Starting at $79 /mo Contact for pricing
Free trial No No
Number of plans 3 Custom
CASEpeer pricing verified: 2026-04-11 Centerbase pricing verified: 2026-04-11

What the pricing really means

CASEpeer publishes their pricing upfront, which is a good sign. Centerbase requires you to contact sales for a quote. When a company hides pricing, it usually means the cost is high enough that they want a salesperson to justify it before you see the number. Always ask for total year-one cost, not just the monthly subscription.

Where CASEpeer wins

  • Medical records tracking and treatment timelines are built in, not bolted on — PI firms can track every provider, visit, and bill in one place
  • Settlement calculator with lien tracking helps you see the real numbers before negotiating
  • Capterra rating of 4.8/5 reflects genuine PI-firm satisfaction — the tool was built by a PI attorney
  • Demand letter builder on the Pro plan generates settlement demands from your case data automatically

Where Centerbase wins

  • Financial reporting and profitability analysis is deeper than most competitors, with partner compensation tracking
  • LEDES billing built in with proper compliance for corporate and insurance clients
  • Multi-office and multi-entity support for firms with multiple locations
  • Custom pricing means you negotiate based on firm size, which can work in your favor

Where CASEpeer falls short

  • Only useful for PI and related practice areas — if you handle any other type of law, you'll need a second tool
  • Trust tracking is basic compared to dedicated accounting tools like CosmoLex
  • eSignature is available as an add-on, not included in base plans
  • No free trial and no public pricing on the website — you have to request a demo

Where Centerbase falls short

  • No public pricing — you have to go through sales, and mid-market typically means $100-200/user/month
  • G2 rating of 4.0 suggests the user experience has room for improvement
  • Fewer reviews (80 total) than major competitors means less community knowledge base
  • Probably overkill for firms under 10 attorneys

Who is each product built for?

CASEpeer

Target: 1-30 attorneys

If you run a personal injury firm, CASEpeer does things that general practice management tools can't — medical tracking, settlement calculations, and demand letter generation. If you practice anything other than PI, look at Clio or MyCase instead.

Personal InjuryMass TortWorkers' Compensation

Centerbase

Target: 10-200 attorneys

Centerbase targets the gap between Clio and enterprise systems like Thomson Reuters. If you're a 20-100 attorney firm that needs serious financial reporting and LEDES billing, it's worth a demo. Smaller firms should stick with Clio or CosmoLex.

LitigationCorporateLabor and EmploymentInsurance Defense

Feature comparison

Feature CASEpeer Centerbase
Case Management
Case / matter management
Contact management
Conflict checks
Client intake forms
Client portal
Documents & Automation
Document management
Document automation
E-signatures
Email management
Billing & Accounting
Time tracking
Billing & invoicing
Trust / IOLTA accounting
Scheduling & Deadlines
Calendar management
Task management
Court rule deadlines
Platform
Reporting / analytics
Mobile app
API access

Common questions

CASEpeer scores 7.9/10 vs Centerbase's 7.5/10 in our ranking. CASEpeer is the better pick for 1-30 attorneys. Centerbase is better if you need mid-size firms (10-200 attorneys) that have outgrown clio and need more powerful financial reporting, ledes billing, and multi-office support.

CASEpeer starts at $79/month. Centerbase uses custom pricing (contact sales). Watch for add-on costs — the base price often does not include all features. Pricing last verified 2026-04-11.

CASEpeer: No free trial. Centerbase: No free trial. Always test with your actual workflow before committing to an annual plan.

CASEpeer covers 18 of 18 features we track. Centerbase covers 18 of 18. Both are tied on feature coverage, but more features does not always mean better — pick the tool that covers what your business actually needs.

Yes, CASEpeer has a mobile app. Centerbase does too.

Yes. The main effort is migrating your data (customer lists, job history, invoices). Plan for 1-2 weeks of overlap where you run both. Most legal practice management tools can import CSV data. Ask both vendors about migration support before you sign.

The bottom line

Pick CASEpeer if...

PI firms that need medical records tracking, treatment timeline management, and settlement calculations built into their case management from day one.

Pick Centerbase if...

Mid-size firms (10-200 attorneys) that have outgrown Clio and need more powerful financial reporting, LEDES billing, and multi-office support.

Related comparisons