CASEpeer vs ProLaw
CASEpeer scores 7.9/10 vs 6.0/10. Best for: PI firms that need medical records tracking, treatment timeline management, and settlement calculations built into their case management from day one.
CASEpeer scores higher overall at 7.9/10 vs 6.0/10. If you run a personal injury firm, CASEpeer does things that general practice management tools can't — medical tracking, settlement calculations, and demand letter generation. If you practice anything other than PI, look at Clio or MyCase instead.
CASEpeer 
ProLaw Rank
#5 of 39
Rank
#37 of 39
Features
18/18
Features
16/18
Starting at
$79/mo
Starting at
Custom
User reviews
4.6/5 (200)
User reviews
3.5/5 (50)
What they cost
| CASEpeer | ProLaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting at | $79 /mo | Contact for pricing |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Number of plans | 3 | Custom |
What the pricing really means
CASEpeer publishes their pricing upfront, which is a good sign. ProLaw requires you to contact sales for a quote. When a company hides pricing, it usually means the cost is high enough that they want a salesperson to justify it before you see the number. Always ask for total year-one cost, not just the monthly subscription.
Where CASEpeer wins
- Medical records tracking and treatment timelines are built in, not bolted on — PI firms can track every provider, visit, and bill in one place
- Settlement calculator with lien tracking helps you see the real numbers before negotiating
- Capterra rating of 4.8/5 reflects genuine PI-firm satisfaction — the tool was built by a PI attorney
- Demand letter builder on the Pro plan generates settlement demands from your case data automatically
Where ProLaw wins
- Backed by Thomson Reuters with direct integration to Westlaw and Practical Law
- Enterprise-grade financial management with LEDES billing, matter budgets, and profitability analysis
- Trust accounting with multi-bank, multi-currency support for large international firms
- Court rule calendaring included
Where CASEpeer falls short
- Only useful for PI and related practice areas — if you handle any other type of law, you'll need a second tool
- Trust tracking is basic compared to dedicated accounting tools like CosmoLex
- eSignature is available as an add-on, not included in base plans
- No free trial and no public pricing on the website — you have to request a demo
Where ProLaw falls short
- G2 rating of 3.5 and Capterra 3.8 indicate significant user frustration with the interface
- No public pricing — likely $200+/user based on the enterprise positioning
- No client portal, no mobile app, no eSignature, no intake forms
- Implementation takes months, not days
Who is each product built for?
CASEpeer
Target: 1-30 attorneys
If you run a personal injury firm, CASEpeer does things that general practice management tools can't — medical tracking, settlement calculations, and demand letter generation. If you practice anything other than PI, look at Clio or MyCase instead.
ProLaw
Target: 25-1,000+ attorneys
ProLaw is a legacy enterprise product. Large firms already invested in Thomson Reuters' ecosystem may find value in the Westlaw integration, but modern alternatives like Filevine or Litify offer better user experiences at every scale.
Feature comparison
| Feature | CASEpeer | ProLaw |
|---|---|---|
| Case Management | ||
| Case / matter management | ||
| Contact management | ||
| Conflict checks | ||
| Client intake forms | ||
| Client portal | ||
| Documents & Automation | ||
| Document management | ||
| Document automation | ||
| E-signatures | ||
| Email management | ||
| Billing & Accounting | ||
| Time tracking | ||
| Billing & invoicing | ||
| Trust / IOLTA accounting | ||
| Scheduling & Deadlines | ||
| Calendar management | ||
| Task management | ||
| Court rule deadlines | ||
| Platform | ||
| Reporting / analytics | ||
| Mobile app | ||
| API access | ||
Common questions
CASEpeer scores 7.9/10 vs ProLaw's 6.0/10 in our ranking. CASEpeer is the better pick for 1-30 attorneys. ProLaw is better if you need large firms (50+ attorneys) that want enterprise practice management from a trusted legal tech brand with deep integration into thomson reuters' legal research ecosystem.
CASEpeer starts at $79/month. ProLaw uses custom pricing (contact sales). Watch for add-on costs — the base price often does not include all features. Pricing last verified 2026-04-11.
CASEpeer: No free trial. ProLaw: No free trial. Always test with your actual workflow before committing to an annual plan.
CASEpeer covers 18 of 18 features we track. ProLaw covers 16 of 18. CASEpeer has broader feature coverage, but more features does not always mean better — pick the tool that covers what your business actually needs.
Yes, CASEpeer has a mobile app. ProLaw does too.
Yes. The main effort is migrating your data (customer lists, job history, invoices). Plan for 1-2 weeks of overlap where you run both. Most legal practice management tools can import CSV data. Ask both vendors about migration support before you sign.
The bottom line
Pick CASEpeer if...
PI firms that need medical records tracking, treatment timeline management, and settlement calculations built into their case management from day one.
Pick ProLaw if...
Large firms (50+ attorneys) that want enterprise practice management from a trusted legal tech brand with deep integration into Thomson Reuters' legal research ecosystem.