CASEpeer vs RunSensible
CASEpeer scores 7.9/10 vs 6.7/10. Best for: PI firms that need medical records tracking, treatment timeline management, and settlement calculations built into their case management from day one.
CASEpeer scores higher overall at 7.9/10 vs 6.7/10. If you run a personal injury firm, CASEpeer does things that general practice management tools can't — medical tracking, settlement calculations, and demand letter generation. If you practice anything other than PI, look at Clio or MyCase instead.
CASEpeer 
RunSensible Rank
#5 of 39
Rank
#27 of 39
Features
18/18
Features
16/18
Starting at
$79/mo
Starting at
$49/mo
User reviews
4.6/5 (200)
User reviews
4.4/5 (30)
What they cost
| CASEpeer | RunSensible | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting at | $79 /mo | $49 /mo |
| Free trial | No | 14 days |
| Number of plans | 3 | 3 |
What the pricing really means
At first glance, RunSensible looks cheaper at $49/month vs $79/month. But sticker price is only part of the story. Look at what is included on the base plan, how many users you get, and whether you need add-ons to get the features you actually need. The $99/month plan that requires $200 in add-ons is actually more expensive than the $250/month plan that includes everything.
Where CASEpeer wins
- Medical records tracking and treatment timelines are built in, not bolted on — PI firms can track every provider, visit, and bill in one place
- Settlement calculator with lien tracking helps you see the real numbers before negotiating
- Capterra rating of 4.8/5 reflects genuine PI-firm satisfaction — the tool was built by a PI attorney
- Demand letter builder on the Pro plan generates settlement demands from your case data automatically
Where RunSensible wins
- Built-in VoIP phone system and texting means all client communications are logged automatically to matters
- Competitive pricing starting at $49/user for CRM with phone integration
- 14-day free trial to test the phone system with real calls
- CRM pipeline for intake is well-designed for tracking leads through conversion
Where CASEpeer falls short
- Only useful for PI and related practice areas — if you handle any other type of law, you'll need a second tool
- Trust tracking is basic compared to dedicated accounting tools like CosmoLex
- eSignature is available as an add-on, not included in base plans
- No free trial and no public pricing on the website — you have to request a demo
Where RunSensible falls short
- Very few reviews (30 total across platforms) — the product is relatively new with a small user base
- No conflict checks or court rule deadlines
- Full practice management requires the $89 plan; trust accounting requires $149
- Smaller company means uncertain long-term viability compared to established players
Who is each product built for?
CASEpeer
Target: 1-30 attorneys
If you run a personal injury firm, CASEpeer does things that general practice management tools can't — medical tracking, settlement calculations, and demand letter generation. If you practice anything other than PI, look at Clio or MyCase instead.
RunSensible
Target: 1-20 attorneys
RunSensible is interesting if your firm's biggest pain is scattered phone communications. The built-in VoIP is genuinely useful. But the small user base and missing features mean you're taking a risk on a newer product.
Feature comparison
| Feature | CASEpeer | RunSensible |
|---|---|---|
| Case Management | ||
| Case / matter management | ||
| Contact management | ||
| Conflict checks | ||
| Client intake forms | ||
| Client portal | ||
| Documents & Automation | ||
| Document management | ||
| Document automation | ||
| E-signatures | ||
| Email management | ||
| Billing & Accounting | ||
| Time tracking | ||
| Billing & invoicing | ||
| Trust / IOLTA accounting | ||
| Scheduling & Deadlines | ||
| Calendar management | ||
| Task management | ||
| Court rule deadlines | ||
| Platform | ||
| Reporting / analytics | ||
| Mobile app | ||
| API access | ||
Common questions
CASEpeer scores 7.9/10 vs RunSensible's 6.7/10 in our ranking. CASEpeer is the better pick for 1-30 attorneys. RunSensible is better if you need firms that want a built-in phone system and texting alongside practice management so they can track all client communications in one place.
CASEpeer starts at $79/month. RunSensible starts at $49/month. Watch for add-on costs — the base price often does not include all features. Pricing last verified 2026-04-11.
CASEpeer: No free trial. RunSensible: Yes, 14-day free trial. Always test with your actual workflow before committing to an annual plan.
CASEpeer covers 18 of 18 features we track. RunSensible covers 16 of 18. CASEpeer has broader feature coverage, but more features does not always mean better — pick the tool that covers what your business actually needs.
Yes, CASEpeer has a mobile app. RunSensible does too.
Yes. The main effort is migrating your data (customer lists, job history, invoices). Plan for 1-2 weeks of overlap where you run both. Most legal practice management tools can import CSV data. Ask both vendors about migration support before you sign.
The bottom line
Pick CASEpeer if...
PI firms that need medical records tracking, treatment timeline management, and settlement calculations built into their case management from day one.
Pick RunSensible if...
Firms that want a built-in phone system and texting alongside practice management so they can track all client communications in one place.