Clio vs RunSensible
Clio scores 8.5/10 vs 6.7/10. Best for: Firms of any size that want the most widely-adopted cloud practice management platform with deep integrations and a proven track record.
Clio scores higher overall at 8.5/10 vs 6.7/10. Clio is the safe pick for most law firms. It covers everything, integrates with everything, and has the largest support ecosystem. Skip it if you're a solo attorney watching every dollar — $49/month per user for EasyStart is reasonable, but you'll want Advanced ($119) to get the features that actually matter.
Clio 
RunSensible Rank
#1 of 39
Rank
#27 of 39
Features
18/18
Features
16/18
Starting at
$49/mo
Starting at
$49/mo
User reviews
4.6/5 (1900)
User reviews
4.4/5 (30)
What they cost
| Clio | RunSensible | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting at | $49 /mo | $49 /mo |
| Free trial | 7 days | 14 days |
| Number of plans | 4 | 3 |
What the pricing really means
At first glance, RunSensible looks cheaper at $49/month vs $49/month. But sticker price is only part of the story. Look at what is included on the base plan, how many users you get, and whether you need add-ons to get the features you actually need. The $99/month plan that requires $200 in add-ons is actually more expensive than the $250/month plan that includes everything.
Where Clio wins
- Largest user base in legal tech, which means 250+ integrations, active community forums, and no shortage of YouTube walkthroughs
- Clio Grow (intake and CRM) bundles into the Complete plan, so you get lead tracking without bolting on another tool
- Mobile app actually works for time tracking between court appearances and client meetings
- 7-day free trial with no credit card, plus they offer data migration assistance from competing products
Where RunSensible wins
- Built-in VoIP phone system and texting means all client communications are logged automatically to matters
- Competitive pricing starting at $49/user for CRM with phone integration
- 14-day free trial to test the phone system with real calls
- CRM pipeline for intake is well-designed for tracking leads through conversion
Where Clio falls short
- Pricing adds up fast at $149/user/month for the Complete plan — a 5-attorney firm pays $745/month before any add-ons
- Trust accounting is solid but not as deep as CosmoLex, which was purpose-built for legal accounting
- Court rule calendaring requires the Advanced plan at $119/user — not available on the cheaper tiers
- Some users report the reporting tools lag behind what you'd get from a dedicated BI tool
Where RunSensible falls short
- Very few reviews (30 total across platforms) — the product is relatively new with a small user base
- No conflict checks or court rule deadlines
- Full practice management requires the $89 plan; trust accounting requires $149
- Smaller company means uncertain long-term viability compared to established players
Who is each product built for?
Clio
Target: 1-100+ attorneys
Clio is the safe pick for most law firms. It covers everything, integrates with everything, and has the largest support ecosystem. Skip it if you're a solo attorney watching every dollar — $49/month per user for EasyStart is reasonable, but you'll want Advanced ($119) to get the features that actually matter.
RunSensible
Target: 1-20 attorneys
RunSensible is interesting if your firm's biggest pain is scattered phone communications. The built-in VoIP is genuinely useful. But the small user base and missing features mean you're taking a risk on a newer product.
Feature comparison
| Feature | Clio | RunSensible |
|---|---|---|
| Case Management | ||
| Case / matter management | ||
| Contact management | ||
| Conflict checks | ||
| Client intake forms | ||
| Client portal | ||
| Documents & Automation | ||
| Document management | ||
| Document automation | ||
| E-signatures | ||
| Email management | ||
| Billing & Accounting | ||
| Time tracking | ||
| Billing & invoicing | ||
| Trust / IOLTA accounting | ||
| Scheduling & Deadlines | ||
| Calendar management | ||
| Task management | ||
| Court rule deadlines | ||
| Platform | ||
| Reporting / analytics | ||
| Mobile app | ||
| API access | ||
Common questions
Clio scores 8.5/10 vs RunSensible's 6.7/10 in our ranking. Clio is the better pick for 1-100+ attorneys. RunSensible is better if you need firms that want a built-in phone system and texting alongside practice management so they can track all client communications in one place.
Clio starts at $49/month. RunSensible starts at $49/month. Watch for add-on costs — the base price often does not include all features. Pricing last verified 2026-04-11.
Clio: Yes, 7-day free trial. RunSensible: Yes, 14-day free trial. Always test with your actual workflow before committing to an annual plan.
Clio covers 18 of 18 features we track. RunSensible covers 16 of 18. Clio has broader feature coverage, but more features does not always mean better — pick the tool that covers what your business actually needs.
Yes, Clio has a mobile app. RunSensible does too.
Yes. The main effort is migrating your data (customer lists, job history, invoices). Plan for 1-2 weeks of overlap where you run both. Most legal practice management tools can import CSV data. Ask both vendors about migration support before you sign.
The bottom line
Pick Clio if...
Firms of any size that want the most widely-adopted cloud practice management platform with deep integrations and a proven track record.
Pick RunSensible if...
Firms that want a built-in phone system and texting alongside practice management so they can track all client communications in one place.