CloudLex vs RunSensible
CloudLex scores 7.2/10 vs 6.7/10. Best for: PI firms that want a cloud-native case management system with medical records tracking, demand package creation, and settlement management.
CloudLex scores higher overall at 7.2/10 vs 6.7/10. CloudLex competes directly with CASEpeer for PI firms. The medical records module and demand builder are strong. Get demos from both CloudLex and CASEpeer and pick based on which workflow fits your firm better.
CloudLex 
RunSensible Rank
#20 of 39
Rank
#27 of 39
Features
17/18
Features
16/18
Starting at
Custom
Starting at
$49/mo
User reviews
4.7/5 (80)
User reviews
4.4/5 (30)
What they cost
| CloudLex | RunSensible | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting at | Contact for pricing | $49 /mo |
| Free trial | No | 14 days |
| Number of plans | Custom | 3 |
What the pricing really means
RunSensible publishes their pricing upfront, which is a good sign. CloudLex requires you to contact sales for a quote. When a company hides pricing, it usually means the cost is high enough that they want a salesperson to justify it before you see the number. Always ask for total year-one cost, not just the monthly subscription.
Where CloudLex wins
- Medical records module tracks providers, treatments, liens, and balances in one timeline view
- Demand package builder assembles settlement demands from case data automatically
- G2 rating of 4.7 shows strong satisfaction among PI firms that use it
- Built in the cloud from day one, unlike competitors that migrated from desktop
Where RunSensible wins
- Built-in VoIP phone system and texting means all client communications are logged automatically to matters
- Competitive pricing starting at $49/user for CRM with phone integration
- 14-day free trial to test the phone system with real calls
- CRM pipeline for intake is well-designed for tracking leads through conversion
Where CloudLex falls short
- No public pricing — custom quotes only
- Only useful for personal injury and related practice areas
- No trust accounting built in
- Smaller ecosystem and fewer integrations than generalist tools like Clio
Where RunSensible falls short
- Very few reviews (30 total across platforms) — the product is relatively new with a small user base
- No conflict checks or court rule deadlines
- Full practice management requires the $89 plan; trust accounting requires $149
- Smaller company means uncertain long-term viability compared to established players
Who is each product built for?
CloudLex
Target: 1-25 attorneys
CloudLex competes directly with CASEpeer for PI firms. The medical records module and demand builder are strong. Get demos from both CloudLex and CASEpeer and pick based on which workflow fits your firm better.
RunSensible
Target: 1-20 attorneys
RunSensible is interesting if your firm's biggest pain is scattered phone communications. The built-in VoIP is genuinely useful. But the small user base and missing features mean you're taking a risk on a newer product.
Feature comparison
| Feature | CloudLex | RunSensible |
|---|---|---|
| Case Management | ||
| Case / matter management | ||
| Contact management | ||
| Conflict checks | ||
| Client intake forms | ||
| Client portal | ||
| Documents & Automation | ||
| Document management | ||
| Document automation | ||
| E-signatures | ||
| Email management | ||
| Billing & Accounting | ||
| Time tracking | ||
| Billing & invoicing | ||
| Trust / IOLTA accounting | ||
| Scheduling & Deadlines | ||
| Calendar management | ||
| Task management | ||
| Court rule deadlines | ||
| Platform | ||
| Reporting / analytics | ||
| Mobile app | ||
| API access | ||
Common questions
CloudLex scores 7.2/10 vs RunSensible's 6.7/10 in our ranking. CloudLex is the better pick for 1-25 attorneys. RunSensible is better if you need firms that want a built-in phone system and texting alongside practice management so they can track all client communications in one place.
CloudLex uses custom pricing (contact sales). RunSensible starts at $49/month. Watch for add-on costs — the base price often does not include all features. Pricing last verified 2026-04-11.
CloudLex: No free trial. RunSensible: Yes, 14-day free trial. Always test with your actual workflow before committing to an annual plan.
CloudLex covers 17 of 18 features we track. RunSensible covers 16 of 18. CloudLex has broader feature coverage, but more features does not always mean better — pick the tool that covers what your business actually needs.
Yes, CloudLex has a mobile app. RunSensible does too.
Yes. The main effort is migrating your data (customer lists, job history, invoices). Plan for 1-2 weeks of overlap where you run both. Most legal practice management tools can import CSV data. Ask both vendors about migration support before you sign.
The bottom line
Pick CloudLex if...
PI firms that want a cloud-native case management system with medical records tracking, demand package creation, and settlement management.
Pick RunSensible if...
Firms that want a built-in phone system and texting alongside practice management so they can track all client communications in one place.