Jove (formerly GrowPath) vs ProLaw
Jove (formerly GrowPath) scores 6.9/10 vs 6.0/10. Best for: PI and mass tort firms that want integrated intake call center management alongside case management.
Jove (formerly GrowPath) scores higher overall at 6.9/10 vs 6.0/10. GrowPath is built for PI and mass tort firms that run intake operations like a business — call centers, ad tracking, and lead scoring. If that's your model, demo it. If you just need basic PI case management, CASEpeer is simpler.
Jove (formerly GrowPath) 
ProLaw Rank
#25 of 39
Rank
#37 of 39
Features
16/18
Features
16/18
Starting at
Custom
Starting at
Custom
User reviews
4.4/5 (30)
User reviews
3.5/5 (50)
What they cost
| Jove (formerly GrowPath) | ProLaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting at | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Number of plans | Custom | Custom |
What the pricing really means
Both Jove (formerly GrowPath) and ProLaw use custom pricing, which means you need to talk to sales. In our experience, custom pricing usually means the product is targeting larger operations and the monthly cost will be higher than products with published prices. Ask specifically about total year-one cost, including setup, onboarding, and training.
Where Jove (formerly GrowPath) wins
- Intake module designed for call center teams with scripts, qualification questions, and lead scoring
- Mass tort campaign management tracks advertising spend vs signed cases for ROI visibility
- Medical records ordering and tracking integrated into the case workflow
- Real-time dashboards show intake conversion rates and case pipeline value
Where ProLaw wins
- Backed by Thomson Reuters with direct integration to Westlaw and Practical Law
- Enterprise-grade financial management with LEDES billing, matter budgets, and profitability analysis
- Trust accounting with multi-bank, multi-currency support for large international firms
- Court rule calendaring included
Where Jove (formerly GrowPath) falls short
- No trust accounting — you'll need a separate tool for IOLTA compliance
- Very few reviews (30 total), making it hard to assess long-term reliability
- Custom pricing with no public information
Where ProLaw falls short
- G2 rating of 3.5 and Capterra 3.8 indicate significant user frustration with the interface
- No public pricing — likely $200+/user based on the enterprise positioning
- No client portal, no mobile app, no eSignature, no intake forms
- Implementation takes months, not days
Who is each product built for?
Jove (formerly GrowPath)
Target: 5-100 attorneys
GrowPath is built for PI and mass tort firms that run intake operations like a business — call centers, ad tracking, and lead scoring. If that's your model, demo it. If you just need basic PI case management, CASEpeer is simpler.
ProLaw
Target: 25-1,000+ attorneys
ProLaw is a legacy enterprise product. Large firms already invested in Thomson Reuters' ecosystem may find value in the Westlaw integration, but modern alternatives like Filevine or Litify offer better user experiences at every scale.
Feature comparison
| Feature | Jove (formerly GrowPath) | ProLaw |
|---|---|---|
| Case Management | ||
| Case / matter management | ||
| Contact management | ||
| Conflict checks | ||
| Client intake forms | ||
| Client portal | ||
| Documents & Automation | ||
| Document management | ||
| Document automation | ||
| E-signatures | ||
| Email management | ||
| Billing & Accounting | ||
| Time tracking | ||
| Billing & invoicing | ||
| Trust / IOLTA accounting | ||
| Scheduling & Deadlines | ||
| Calendar management | ||
| Task management | ||
| Court rule deadlines | ||
| Platform | ||
| Reporting / analytics | ||
| Mobile app | ||
| API access | ||
Common questions
Jove (formerly GrowPath) scores 6.9/10 vs ProLaw's 6.0/10 in our ranking. Jove (formerly GrowPath) is the better pick for 5-100 attorneys. ProLaw is better if you need large firms (50+ attorneys) that want enterprise practice management from a trusted legal tech brand with deep integration into thomson reuters' legal research ecosystem.
Jove (formerly GrowPath) uses custom pricing (contact sales). ProLaw uses custom pricing (contact sales). Watch for add-on costs — the base price often does not include all features. Pricing last verified 2026-04-11.
Jove (formerly GrowPath): No free trial. ProLaw: No free trial. Always test with your actual workflow before committing to an annual plan.
Jove (formerly GrowPath) covers 16 of 18 features we track. ProLaw covers 16 of 18. Both are tied on feature coverage, but more features does not always mean better — pick the tool that covers what your business actually needs.
Yes, Jove (formerly GrowPath) has a mobile app. ProLaw does too.
Yes. The main effort is migrating your data (customer lists, job history, invoices). Plan for 1-2 weeks of overlap where you run both. Most legal practice management tools can import CSV data. Ask both vendors about migration support before you sign.
The bottom line
Pick Jove (formerly GrowPath) if...
PI and mass tort firms that want integrated intake call center management alongside case management.
Pick ProLaw if...
Large firms (50+ attorneys) that want enterprise practice management from a trusted legal tech brand with deep integration into Thomson Reuters' legal research ecosystem.