Practice Better vs Valant
Practice Better scores 8.4/10 vs 5.8/10. Best for: Nutritionists, dietitians, and health coaches who need food journaling and program delivery alongside scheduling and billing, not just a generic EHR with templates swapped out.
Practice Better scores higher overall at 8.4/10 vs 5.8/10. Buy Practice Better if you are a nutritionist, dietitian, or health coach who wants client programs and food tracking alongside scheduling and billing. Skip if you are a therapist who needs insurance billing and clinical documentation as the primary workflow.
Practice Better 
Valant Rank
#1 of 41
Rank
#41 of 41
Features
16/18
Features
17/18
Starting at
$0/mo
Starting at
$100/mo
User reviews
4.7/5 (391)
User reviews
3/5 (333)
What they cost
| Practice Better | Valant | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting at | Free /mo | $100 /mo |
| Free trial | Free tier available | No |
| Number of plans | 5 | 3 |
What the pricing really means
At first glance, Practice Better looks cheaper at $0/month vs $100/month. But sticker price is only part of the story. Look at what is included on the base plan, how many users you get, and whether you need add-ons to get the features you actually need. The $99/month plan that requires $200 in add-ons is actually more expensive than the $250/month plan that includes everything.
Where Practice Better wins
- Best-reviewed platform in the category with 4.7 on G2 and 4.8 on Capterra across nearly 400 combined reviews
- Free tier lets you test with 3 real clients before paying anything, which is more useful than a time-limited trial
- Food journaling and program delivery are built in from the ground up, not bolted on as afterthoughts
- 90-day affiliate cookie is the most generous in the healthcare practice management space
Where Valant wins
- 80+ built-in reportable outcome measures that auto-send, score, and graph over time, which is the deepest measurement-based care in the category
- E-prescribing with EPCS and PDMP integration included, so psychiatrists can prescribe controlled substances without a separate tool
- MYIO patient portal app for iOS and Android handles intake, payments, and appointment management from the client side
- Telehealth supports group sessions with up to 30 participants, screen sharing, and whiteboard, which is more than most competitors
Where Practice Better falls short
- Free tier is extremely limited at 3 clients and 100MB storage, which fills up fast with intake forms and session notes
- E-prescribing is a $49/mo add-on, making it one of the most expensive prescribing features in the category
- Zapier integration only available on the Team plan at $155/mo, so automating workflows on cheaper plans requires workarounds
- Built for wellness practitioners first and mental health second, so therapists may find the clinical documentation templates lacking
Where Valant falls short
- G2 rating of 3.0/5 is among the lowest in the category, with complaints about navigation, glitches, and a steep learning curve
- No published pricing means you must contact sales for a quote, and reported costs of $100-300/mo make it one of the pricier options
- No free trial available, so you commit based on a demo rather than hands-on testing with your own workflows
- Multiple reviewers report that telehealth sessions drop or lag, and the patient portal setup is described as an administrative headache
Who is each product built for?
Practice Better
Target: 1-20 practitioners
Buy Practice Better if you are a nutritionist, dietitian, or health coach who wants client programs and food tracking alongside scheduling and billing. Skip if you are a therapist who needs insurance billing and clinical documentation as the primary workflow.
Valant
Target: 1-50 providers
Buy Valant if measurement-based care and psychiatry features like EPCS are non-negotiable for your practice. Skip if you want transparent pricing, a free trial, or reliable telehealth.
Feature comparison
| Feature | Practice Better | Valant |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance & Security | ||
| HIPAA compliant | ||
| Telehealth / video sessions | ||
| Secure messaging | ||
| Scheduling & Clients | ||
| Online scheduling | ||
| Client portal | ||
| Intake forms / assessments | ||
| Automated reminders | ||
| Clinical | ||
| Progress notes / documentation | ||
| Treatment plans | ||
| E-prescribing | ||
| Outcome measures / assessments | ||
| Billing & Payments | ||
| Insurance billing / claims | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Superbill generation | ||
| Automated billing | ||
| Platform | ||
| Group practice support | ||
| Mobile app | ||
| Integrations / API | ||
Common questions
Practice Better scores 8.4/10 vs Valant's 5.8/10 in our ranking. Practice Better is the better pick for 1-20 practitioners. Valant is better if you need behavioral health practices that need built-in measurement-based care with 80+ outcome scales and want to demonstrate treatment effectiveness to insurers.
Practice Better starts at $0/month. Valant starts at $100/month. Watch for add-on costs — the base price often does not include all features. Pricing last verified 2026-04-01.
Practice Better: Yes, 14-day free trial. Valant: No free trial. Always test with your actual workflow before committing to an annual plan.
Practice Better covers 16 of 18 features we track. Valant covers 17 of 18. Valant has broader feature coverage, but more features does not always mean better — pick the tool that covers what your business actually needs.
Yes, Practice Better has a mobile app. Valant does not.
Yes. The main effort is migrating your data (customer lists, job history, invoices). Plan for 1-2 weeks of overlap where you run both. Most healthcare practice management tools can import CSV data. Ask both vendors about migration support before you sign.
The bottom line
Pick Practice Better if...
Nutritionists, dietitians, and health coaches who need food journaling and program delivery alongside scheduling and billing, not just a generic EHR with templates swapped out.
Pick Valant if...
Behavioral health practices that need built-in measurement-based care with 80+ outcome scales and want to demonstrate treatment effectiveness to insurers.