TherapyNotes vs Valant

TherapyNotes scores 8.2/10 vs 5.8/10. Best for: Behavioral health clinicians who spend too much time on documentation and want an EHR that was actually designed around therapy notes, not adapted from a general medical template.

TherapyNotes logo

TherapyNotes

8.2
Better overall
vs
Valant logo

Valant

5.8

TherapyNotes scores higher overall at 8.2/10 vs 5.8/10. Buy TherapyNotes if documentation and insurance billing are your top priorities and you want a platform that thinks like a clinician. Skip if you need integrations with external tools or if per-message reminder costs would eat into your margins.

TherapyNotes
Valant

Rank

#3 of 41

Rank

#41 of 41

Features

17/18

Features

17/18

Starting at

$69/mo

Starting at

$100/mo

User reviews

4.4/5 (1052)

User reviews

3/5 (333)

What they cost

TherapyNotes Valant
Starting at $69 /mo $100 /mo
Free trial 30 days No
Number of plans 3 3
TherapyNotes pricing verified: 2026-04-01 Valant pricing verified: 2026-04-01

What the pricing really means

At first glance, TherapyNotes looks cheaper at $69/month vs $100/month. But sticker price is only part of the story. Look at what is included on the base plan, how many users you get, and whether you need add-ons to get the features you actually need. The $99/month plan that requires $200 in add-ons is actually more expensive than the $250/month plan that includes everything.

Where TherapyNotes wins

  • Purpose-built for behavioral health notes with structured templates that match how therapists actually document, not generic medical forms bolted on
  • Insurance billing and ERA posting are genuinely good, with electronic claim submission and automated payment reconciliation
  • E-prescribing with EPCS included in the base price, so psychiatrists do not need a separate add-on
  • Capterra 4.7 with nearly 1,000 reviews is one of the highest satisfaction scores in the category

Where Valant wins

  • 80+ built-in reportable outcome measures that auto-send, score, and graph over time, which is the deepest measurement-based care in the category
  • E-prescribing with EPCS and PDMP integration included, so psychiatrists can prescribe controlled substances without a separate tool
  • MYIO patient portal app for iOS and Android handles intake, payments, and appointment management from the client side
  • Telehealth supports group sessions with up to 30 participants, screen sharing, and whiteboard, which is more than most competitors

Where TherapyNotes falls short

  • No open API, so you cannot connect to tools they have not pre-built integrations for
  • Per-text reminder charges of $0.14 each add up fast if you send confirmations and follow-ups to every client
  • Premium telehealth is a $15/clinician/mo add-on on top of the base price, while competitors include it
  • Mobile app only launched January 2026 and is still maturing compared to SimplePractice's years-old app

Where Valant falls short

  • G2 rating of 3.0/5 is among the lowest in the category, with complaints about navigation, glitches, and a steep learning curve
  • No published pricing means you must contact sales for a quote, and reported costs of $100-300/mo make it one of the pricier options
  • No free trial available, so you commit based on a demo rather than hands-on testing with your own workflows
  • Multiple reviewers report that telehealth sessions drop or lag, and the patient portal setup is described as an administrative headache

Who is each product built for?

TherapyNotes

Target: 1-50 clinicians

Buy TherapyNotes if documentation and insurance billing are your top priorities and you want a platform that thinks like a clinician. Skip if you need integrations with external tools or if per-message reminder costs would eat into your margins.

TherapistsPsychiatristsPsychologists

Valant

Target: 1-50 providers

Buy Valant if measurement-based care and psychiatry features like EPCS are non-negotiable for your practice. Skip if you want transparent pricing, a free trial, or reliable telehealth.

PsychiatristsPsychologistsTherapistsBehavioral Health Practices

Feature comparison

Feature TherapyNotes Valant
Compliance & Security
HIPAA compliant
Telehealth / video sessions
Secure messaging
Scheduling & Clients
Online scheduling
Client portal
Intake forms / assessments
Automated reminders
Clinical
Progress notes / documentation
Treatment plans
E-prescribing
Outcome measures / assessments
Billing & Payments
Insurance billing / claims
Payment processing
Superbill generation
Automated billing
Platform
Group practice support
Mobile app
Integrations / API

Common questions

TherapyNotes scores 8.2/10 vs Valant's 5.8/10 in our ranking. TherapyNotes is the better pick for 1-50 clinicians. Valant is better if you need behavioral health practices that need built-in measurement-based care with 80+ outcome scales and want to demonstrate treatment effectiveness to insurers.

TherapyNotes starts at $69/month. Valant starts at $100/month. Watch for add-on costs — the base price often does not include all features. Pricing last verified 2026-04-01.

TherapyNotes: Yes, 30-day free trial. Valant: No free trial. Always test with your actual workflow before committing to an annual plan.

TherapyNotes covers 17 of 18 features we track. Valant covers 17 of 18. Both are tied on feature coverage, but more features does not always mean better — pick the tool that covers what your business actually needs.

Yes, TherapyNotes has a mobile app. Valant does not.

Yes. The main effort is migrating your data (customer lists, job history, invoices). Plan for 1-2 weeks of overlap where you run both. Most healthcare practice management tools can import CSV data. Ask both vendors about migration support before you sign.

The bottom line

Pick TherapyNotes if...

Behavioral health clinicians who spend too much time on documentation and want an EHR that was actually designed around therapy notes, not adapted from a general medical template.

Pick Valant if...

Behavioral health practices that need built-in measurement-based care with 80+ outcome scales and want to demonstrate treatment effectiveness to insurers.

Related comparisons