BreezyNotes vs Valant

BreezyNotes scores 6.5/10 vs 5.8/10. Best for: Canadian mental health professionals who need an EHR that handles Canadian billing codes and insurance workflows out of the box.

BreezyNotes logo

BreezyNotes

6.5
Better overall
vs
Valant logo

Valant

5.8

BreezyNotes scores higher overall at 6.5/10 vs 5.8/10. Buy BreezyNotes if you practice in Canada and need an EHR that understands Canadian insurance billing without workarounds. Skip if you are US-based, need e-prescribing, or want a platform with a larger user community and more reviews.

BreezyNotes
Valant

Rank

#36 of 41

Rank

#41 of 41

Features

14/18

Features

17/18

Starting at

$19/mo

Starting at

$100/mo

User reviews

4/5 (14)

User reviews

3/5 (333)

What they cost

BreezyNotes Valant
Starting at CA$19 /mo $100 /mo
Free trial 30 days No
Number of plans 3 3
BreezyNotes pricing verified: 2026-04-01 Valant pricing verified: 2026-04-01

What the pricing really means

At first glance, BreezyNotes looks cheaper at $19/month vs $100/month. But sticker price is only part of the story. Look at what is included on the base plan, how many users you get, and whether you need add-ons to get the features you actually need. The $99/month plan that requires $200 in add-ons is actually more expensive than the $250/month plan that includes everything.

Where BreezyNotes wins

  • Built specifically for Canadian therapists with Canadian billing codes and insurance workflows, which US-based EHRs typically do not support
  • Pay-per-note pricing starts at $19/mo and scales with volume, so quiet months cost less instead of a flat fee you pay regardless
  • Pricing is per practice, not per therapist, so adding clinicians does not multiply your monthly bill
  • Customer support is consistently praised in reviews for being responsive and treating practices like partners, not ticket numbers

Where Valant wins

  • 80+ built-in reportable outcome measures that auto-send, score, and graph over time, which is the deepest measurement-based care in the category
  • E-prescribing with EPCS and PDMP integration included, so psychiatrists can prescribe controlled substances without a separate tool
  • MYIO patient portal app for iOS and Android handles intake, payments, and appointment management from the client side
  • Telehealth supports group sessions with up to 30 participants, screen sharing, and whiteboard, which is more than most competitors

Where BreezyNotes falls short

  • Only 14 reviews on Capterra, which makes it hard to assess long-term reliability or know what happens when things go wrong
  • No native mobile app, so charting between sessions means logging into a browser on your phone
  • No e-prescribing or outcome measurement tools, so prescribers and researchers will need separate systems
  • Client portal and appointment reminders are reported as not fully functional by some reviewers, with manual data entry still required in spots

Where Valant falls short

  • G2 rating of 3.0/5 is among the lowest in the category, with complaints about navigation, glitches, and a steep learning curve
  • No published pricing means you must contact sales for a quote, and reported costs of $100-300/mo make it one of the pricier options
  • No free trial available, so you commit based on a demo rather than hands-on testing with your own workflows
  • Multiple reviewers report that telehealth sessions drop or lag, and the patient portal setup is described as an administrative headache

Who is each product built for?

BreezyNotes

Target: 1-15 therapists

Buy BreezyNotes if you practice in Canada and need an EHR that understands Canadian insurance billing without workarounds. Skip if you are US-based, need e-prescribing, or want a platform with a larger user community and more reviews.

TherapistsCounselorsPsychologistsSocial Workers

Valant

Target: 1-50 providers

Buy Valant if measurement-based care and psychiatry features like EPCS are non-negotiable for your practice. Skip if you want transparent pricing, a free trial, or reliable telehealth.

PsychiatristsPsychologistsTherapistsBehavioral Health Practices

Feature comparison

Feature BreezyNotes Valant
Compliance & Security
HIPAA compliant
Telehealth / video sessions
Secure messaging
Scheduling & Clients
Online scheduling
Client portal
Intake forms / assessments
Automated reminders
Clinical
Progress notes / documentation
Treatment plans
E-prescribing
Outcome measures / assessments
Billing & Payments
Insurance billing / claims
Payment processing
Superbill generation
Automated billing
Platform
Group practice support
Mobile app
Integrations / API

Common questions

BreezyNotes scores 6.5/10 vs Valant's 5.8/10 in our ranking. BreezyNotes is the better pick for 1-15 therapists. Valant is better if you need behavioral health practices that need built-in measurement-based care with 80+ outcome scales and want to demonstrate treatment effectiveness to insurers.

BreezyNotes starts at $19/month. Valant starts at $100/month. Watch for add-on costs — the base price often does not include all features. Pricing last verified 2026-04-01.

BreezyNotes: Yes, 30-day free trial. Valant: No free trial. Always test with your actual workflow before committing to an annual plan.

BreezyNotes covers 14 of 18 features we track. Valant covers 17 of 18. Valant has broader feature coverage, but more features does not always mean better — pick the tool that covers what your business actually needs.

No, BreezyNotes does not have a mobile app. Valant does not have one either.

Yes. The main effort is migrating your data (customer lists, job history, invoices). Plan for 1-2 weeks of overlap where you run both. Most healthcare practice management tools can import CSV data. Ask both vendors about migration support before you sign.

The bottom line

Pick BreezyNotes if...

Canadian mental health professionals who need an EHR that handles Canadian billing codes and insurance workflows out of the box.

Pick Valant if...

Behavioral health practices that need built-in measurement-based care with 80+ outcome scales and want to demonstrate treatment effectiveness to insurers.