Filevine vs Litify

Filevine scores 8.1/10 vs 7.7/10. Best for: Mid-size to large litigation firms that need a highly customizable case management system with task automation and team collaboration at scale.

Filevine logo

Filevine

8.1
Better overall
vs
Litify logo

Litify

7.7

Filevine scores higher overall at 8.1/10 vs 7.7/10. Filevine is purpose-built for litigation firms that handle high volumes of cases and need customizable workflows. If you're running PI, mass tort, or insurance defense with 5+ attorneys, it's worth the demo. Solo practitioners should look elsewhere.

Filevine
Litify

Rank

#3 of 39

Rank

#8 of 39

Features

17/18

Features

17/18

Starting at

Custom

Starting at

Custom

User reviews

4.7/5 (350)

User reviews

4.3/5 (100)

What they cost

Filevine Litify
Starting at Contact for pricing Contact for pricing
Free trial No No
Number of plans Custom Custom
Filevine pricing verified: 2026-04-11 Litify pricing verified: 2026-04-11

What the pricing really means

Both Filevine and Litify use custom pricing, which means you need to talk to sales. In our experience, custom pricing usually means the product is targeting larger operations and the monthly cost will be higher than products with published prices. Ask specifically about total year-one cost, including setup, onboarding, and training.

Where Filevine wins

  • Highly customizable with custom fields, sections, and workflows that adapt to any practice area without developer help
  • Built-in AI tools for contract review and document analysis, which are genuinely useful not just marketing fluff
  • Task automation and deadline tracking is best-in-class for litigation workflows
  • Acquired Lead Docket for intake and DeadlineDocket for court rules, so the full suite is now comprehensive

Where Litify wins

  • Built on Salesforce, so you get enterprise-grade reporting, dashboards, and the entire AppExchange ecosystem
  • Highly customizable without code — Salesforce admins can modify fields, workflows, and automations
  • Scales to hundreds of users without performance issues, which many legal-specific tools can't handle
  • Strong intake-to-case pipeline with lead scoring and automated follow-ups

Where Filevine falls short

  • No public pricing — you have to sit through a demo call, which usually means it's expensive
  • No trust accounting built in, so you'll still need CosmoLex or QuickBooks for IOLTA compliance
  • Overkill for solo attorneys or 2-3 person firms — the customization power becomes complexity you don't need
  • Steeper learning curve than Clio or MyCase because of all the configuration options

Where Litify falls short

  • No public pricing, and being Salesforce-based means per-user costs are significantly higher than standalone tools
  • Requires Salesforce licenses on top of Litify licensing — double the cost
  • Overkill for firms under 10 attorneys — the complexity isn't worth it
  • No trust accounting built in

Who is each product built for?

Filevine

Target: 5-500+ attorneys

Filevine is purpose-built for litigation firms that handle high volumes of cases and need customizable workflows. If you're running PI, mass tort, or insurance defense with 5+ attorneys, it's worth the demo. Solo practitioners should look elsewhere.

LitigationPersonal InjuryMass TortCorporate LegalInsurance Defense

Litify

Target: 10-500+ attorneys

Litify makes sense if you're a large firm already invested in Salesforce or if you need the customization power that only Salesforce provides. For everyone else, the licensing complexity and cost aren't justified.

LitigationPersonal InjuryMass TortCorporate LegalInsurance Defense

Feature comparison

Feature Filevine Litify
Case Management
Case / matter management
Contact management
Conflict checks
Client intake forms
Client portal
Documents & Automation
Document management
Document automation
E-signatures
Email management
Billing & Accounting
Time tracking
Billing & invoicing
Trust / IOLTA accounting
Scheduling & Deadlines
Calendar management
Task management
Court rule deadlines
Platform
Reporting / analytics
Mobile app
API access

Common questions

Filevine scores 8.1/10 vs Litify's 7.7/10 in our ranking. Filevine is the better pick for 5-500+ attorneys. Litify is better if you need large firms and legal departments that already use salesforce and want practice management that leverages the full salesforce ecosystem.

Filevine uses custom pricing (contact sales). Litify uses custom pricing (contact sales). Watch for add-on costs — the base price often does not include all features. Pricing last verified 2026-04-11.

Filevine: No free trial. Litify: No free trial. Always test with your actual workflow before committing to an annual plan.

Filevine covers 17 of 18 features we track. Litify covers 17 of 18. Both are tied on feature coverage, but more features does not always mean better — pick the tool that covers what your business actually needs.

Yes, Filevine has a mobile app. Litify does too.

Yes. The main effort is migrating your data (customer lists, job history, invoices). Plan for 1-2 weeks of overlap where you run both. Most legal practice management tools can import CSV data. Ask both vendors about migration support before you sign.

The bottom line

Pick Filevine if...

Mid-size to large litigation firms that need a highly customizable case management system with task automation and team collaboration at scale.

Pick Litify if...

Large firms and legal departments that already use Salesforce and want practice management that leverages the full Salesforce ecosystem.

Related comparisons