Filevine vs ProLaw
Filevine scores 8.1/10 vs 6.0/10. Best for: Mid-size to large litigation firms that need a highly customizable case management system with task automation and team collaboration at scale.
Filevine scores higher overall at 8.1/10 vs 6.0/10. Filevine is purpose-built for litigation firms that handle high volumes of cases and need customizable workflows. If you're running PI, mass tort, or insurance defense with 5+ attorneys, it's worth the demo. Solo practitioners should look elsewhere.
Filevine 
ProLaw Rank
#3 of 39
Rank
#37 of 39
Features
18/18
Features
16/18
Starting at
Custom
Starting at
Custom
User reviews
4.7/5 (350)
User reviews
3.5/5 (50)
What they cost
| Filevine | ProLaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting at | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Number of plans | Custom | Custom |
What the pricing really means
Both Filevine and ProLaw use custom pricing, which means you need to talk to sales. In our experience, custom pricing usually means the product is targeting larger operations and the monthly cost will be higher than products with published prices. Ask specifically about total year-one cost, including setup, onboarding, and training.
Where Filevine wins
- Highly customizable with custom fields, sections, and workflows that adapt to any practice area without developer help
- Built-in AI tools for contract review and document analysis, which are genuinely useful not just marketing fluff
- Task automation and deadline tracking is best-in-class for litigation workflows
- Acquired Lead Docket for intake and DeadlineDocket for court rules, so the full suite is now comprehensive
Where ProLaw wins
- Backed by Thomson Reuters with direct integration to Westlaw and Practical Law
- Enterprise-grade financial management with LEDES billing, matter budgets, and profitability analysis
- Trust accounting with multi-bank, multi-currency support for large international firms
- Court rule calendaring included
Where Filevine falls short
- No public pricing — you have to sit through a demo call, which usually means it's expensive
- No trust accounting built in, so you'll still need CosmoLex or QuickBooks for IOLTA compliance
- Overkill for solo attorneys or 2-3 person firms — the customization power becomes complexity you don't need
- Steeper learning curve than Clio or MyCase because of all the configuration options
Where ProLaw falls short
- G2 rating of 3.5 and Capterra 3.8 indicate significant user frustration with the interface
- No public pricing — likely $200+/user based on the enterprise positioning
- No client portal, no mobile app, no eSignature, no intake forms
- Implementation takes months, not days
Who is each product built for?
Filevine
Target: 5-500+ attorneys
Filevine is purpose-built for litigation firms that handle high volumes of cases and need customizable workflows. If you're running PI, mass tort, or insurance defense with 5+ attorneys, it's worth the demo. Solo practitioners should look elsewhere.
ProLaw
Target: 25-1,000+ attorneys
ProLaw is a legacy enterprise product. Large firms already invested in Thomson Reuters' ecosystem may find value in the Westlaw integration, but modern alternatives like Filevine or Litify offer better user experiences at every scale.
Feature comparison
| Feature | Filevine | ProLaw |
|---|---|---|
| Case Management | ||
| Case / matter management | ||
| Contact management | ||
| Conflict checks | ||
| Client intake forms | ||
| Client portal | ||
| Documents & Automation | ||
| Document management | ||
| Document automation | ||
| E-signatures | ||
| Email management | ||
| Billing & Accounting | ||
| Time tracking | ||
| Billing & invoicing | ||
| Trust / IOLTA accounting | ||
| Scheduling & Deadlines | ||
| Calendar management | ||
| Task management | ||
| Court rule deadlines | ||
| Platform | ||
| Reporting / analytics | ||
| Mobile app | ||
| API access | ||
Common questions
Filevine scores 8.1/10 vs ProLaw's 6.0/10 in our ranking. Filevine is the better pick for 5-500+ attorneys. ProLaw is better if you need large firms (50+ attorneys) that want enterprise practice management from a trusted legal tech brand with deep integration into thomson reuters' legal research ecosystem.
Filevine uses custom pricing (contact sales). ProLaw uses custom pricing (contact sales). Watch for add-on costs — the base price often does not include all features. Pricing last verified 2026-04-11.
Filevine: No free trial. ProLaw: No free trial. Always test with your actual workflow before committing to an annual plan.
Filevine covers 18 of 18 features we track. ProLaw covers 16 of 18. Filevine has broader feature coverage, but more features does not always mean better — pick the tool that covers what your business actually needs.
Yes, Filevine has a mobile app. ProLaw does too.
Yes. The main effort is migrating your data (customer lists, job history, invoices). Plan for 1-2 weeks of overlap where you run both. Most legal practice management tools can import CSV data. Ask both vendors about migration support before you sign.
The bottom line
Pick Filevine if...
Mid-size to large litigation firms that need a highly customizable case management system with task automation and team collaboration at scale.
Pick ProLaw if...
Large firms (50+ attorneys) that want enterprise practice management from a trusted legal tech brand with deep integration into Thomson Reuters' legal research ecosystem.