IntakeQ vs Jane App
IntakeQ scores 8.3/10 vs 8.0/10. Best for: Health practitioners who are drowning in paper intake forms and want the best digital forms tool that also handles scheduling and billing.
IntakeQ scores higher overall at 8.3/10 vs 8.0/10. Buy IntakeQ if your biggest headache is paper intake forms and you want the best digital forms tool that also does scheduling and billing. Skip it if you need a full-featured EHR with outcome tracking and deep clinical documentation.
IntakeQ 
Jane App Rank
#2 of 41
Rank
#4 of 41
Features
15/18
Features
16/18
Starting at
$29.9/mo
Starting at
$54/mo
User reviews
4.7/5 (321)
User reviews
4/5 (507)
What they cost
| IntakeQ | Jane App | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting at | $30 /mo | CA$54 /mo |
| Free trial | 14 days | No |
| Number of plans | 4 | 3 |
What the pricing really means
At first glance, IntakeQ looks cheaper at $29.9/month vs $54/month. But sticker price is only part of the story. Look at what is included on the base plan, how many users you get, and whether you need add-ons to get the features you actually need. The $99/month plan that requires $200 in add-ons is actually more expensive than the $250/month plan that includes everything.
Where IntakeQ wins
- The intake forms are the best in the category. Fully customizable, branded, and clients actually complete them before the first session without calling you confused
- Low-volume plans at $29.90 and $59.90 per month let part-time practitioners avoid paying for capacity they do not use
- Month-to-month billing with no contracts. You can upgrade, downgrade, or cancel anytime without penalty
- 4.7 stars on both G2 and Capterra with over 300 reviews. That is not hype, that is consistent satisfaction across years of feedback
- The API is well documented, so if you want to push form data into your own systems or Zapier, you can
Where Jane App wins
- 4.8 Capterra rating is the highest in the practice management category, and 491 reviews back it up
- Built for multidisciplinary clinics so physio, chiro, massage, and counselors all work in one system with discipline-specific templates
- CAD pricing means US-based practices effectively pay 25-30% less than the sticker price
- Free unlimited SMS reminders on Practice plan and up, while competitors charge per message
Where IntakeQ falls short
- The practice management side is an add-on, not the core product. Scheduling and billing work but feel less polished than dedicated EHRs
- No native mobile app. Checking forms and appointments from your phone means using a mobile browser
- If you need full EHR features like outcome measures or treatment plan tracking, IntakeQ does not go deep enough
- Adding practitioners gets expensive. At $30/month per additional provider on the top plan, a five-person practice pays $204.90/month
Where Jane App falls short
- No free trial at all, only guided demos, so you commit before testing with your actual workflow
- Insurance billing is an add-on at CAD $20/mo plus CAD $5 per full-time practitioner, not included in base price
- Only 16 G2 reviews suggests smaller US market presence and less community support stateside
- CAD pricing can confuse US-based practices when credit card statements show different amounts than expected
Who is each product built for?
IntakeQ
Target: 1-20 practitioners
Buy IntakeQ if your biggest headache is paper intake forms and you want the best digital forms tool that also does scheduling and billing. Skip it if you need a full-featured EHR with outcome tracking and deep clinical documentation.
Jane App
Target: 1-15 practitioners
Buy Jane if you run a multidisciplinary clinic or want the highest-rated UX in the category. Skip if you are a solo US therapist who wants straightforward USD pricing and a free trial before committing.
Feature comparison
| Feature | IntakeQ | Jane App |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance & Security | ||
| HIPAA compliant | ||
| Telehealth / video sessions | ||
| Secure messaging | ||
| Scheduling & Clients | ||
| Online scheduling | ||
| Client portal | ||
| Intake forms / assessments | ||
| Automated reminders | ||
| Clinical | ||
| Progress notes / documentation | ||
| Treatment plans | ||
| E-prescribing | ||
| Outcome measures / assessments | ||
| Billing & Payments | ||
| Insurance billing / claims | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Superbill generation | ||
| Automated billing | ||
| Platform | ||
| Group practice support | ||
| Mobile app | ||
| Integrations / API | ||
Common questions
IntakeQ scores 8.3/10 vs Jane App's 8.0/10 in our ranking. IntakeQ is the better pick for 1-20 practitioners. Jane App is better if you need multidisciplinary clinics where physio, chiro, massage, and counselors share one system instead of juggling separate tools per discipline.
IntakeQ starts at $29.9/month. Jane App starts at $54/month. Watch for add-on costs — the base price often does not include all features. Pricing last verified 2026-04-01.
IntakeQ: Yes, 14-day free trial. Jane App: No free trial. Always test with your actual workflow before committing to an annual plan.
IntakeQ covers 15 of 18 features we track. Jane App covers 16 of 18. Jane App has broader feature coverage, but more features does not always mean better — pick the tool that covers what your business actually needs.
No, IntakeQ does not have a mobile app. Jane App does have one.
Yes. The main effort is migrating your data (customer lists, job history, invoices). Plan for 1-2 weeks of overlap where you run both. Most healthcare practice management tools can import CSV data. Ask both vendors about migration support before you sign.
The bottom line
Pick IntakeQ if...
Health practitioners who are drowning in paper intake forms and want the best digital forms tool that also handles scheduling and billing
Pick Jane App if...
Multidisciplinary clinics where physio, chiro, massage, and counselors share one system instead of juggling separate tools per discipline.